By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrkeller said:
Soundwave said:

Nobody goes into PS5 threads to tout the 4090's superiority because they have a life. 

It's only done for one console and one console only and no one has claimed literally 100% equivalent performance ever between Switch 2 and next-gen consoles. Everyone knows there is a trade off and there is an upside for that trade off too, the upside being you get a fully portable experience on top of a home experience. 

How many PS5 threads have someone coming into them and stating for no real particular reason that they own a 4090 and cannot stand to play at game below 120 fps? 

No one really behaves like in those cases. Why? Because they don't feel the need to gate keep. 

No idea.  Because when I was a ps5 owner and people said PC was a generational leap above, I agreed with them.  It isn't that hard to accept the S2 will be a huge upgrade over the Switch, but we'll short of the ps5.  

I'm looking forward to Nintendo software on a 2050.

No it's really not complex, most people don't the need to have to go into every thread and say that because they have some tact. 

Everyone is well aware a Switch 2 is not literally a PS5/XSX, the same way a PS5 is not a 4090 yet runs all the same games at a reasonably playable state. Same way an XBox Series S runs all the XBox Series X games. 

But it's only when it's Switch 2 that certain posters find the need to spam the thread and let it be known they can't play games below 60 fps or "only Sony games are worth playing on this system! Nothing else!!!!!", lol. It's pretty stupid all around. 

Last edited by Soundwave - on 13 February 2024