By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zeldaring said:
Soundwave said:

The PS5 is what it is. There's no magic it has, if it did it would run Cyberpunk 2077 better than it does, unless you are saying they purposely gimped the port of the game. 1440p/60 fps at medium tier settings is the max it can do. 

Just like a 2050 isn't a PS5 exactly, a PS5 certainly isn't a high end GPU either. 

If we're going to bring a 2050 into this, a 2050 runs anything a PS5 can with some dropped settings sure, but it's no game a PS5 game run right now that a 2050 wouldn't be able to run in playable state barring exclusivity nonsense. It's not like the PS5 is running anything at High/Ultra settings, it's ray tracing abilities are shit too, and that's going to be the standard for the next 4-5 years really, like it or not. PS5 Pro is never going to touch sales of the base model. 

Ps5 is gonna be 4 years old by the time switch 2 comes out. My point if anyone cares about third-party games and graphics and performance at the minimum they would have a ps5 by now or a pc equivalent. Now if you want a powerful handheld switch will be a great choice.

And ps5 pro doesn't need to touch sales of base models but if you care about graphics and performance it looking like a great buy.

I wish I never bought a PS5, thing is collecting dust and gets used once in a blue moon as a 4K Blu-Ray player for my QD-OLED. 

Sony's games are polished, but it's the same shit over and over again, played Spider-Man 2 for 15 minutes and just quit, haven't touched it since launch week and zero desire to play it at all. I find the Quest 3 to honestly be a far more interesting gaming device (not paying $700 for a VR headset that has to be wired to a PS5, sorry Sony).