Chrkeller said:
50 fps inside, sure. Outside, not a chance. Trees in particular don't load textures well. System runs fine in smaller games, but outside open world brings it down. The 3050 is weak as is the 2050. I beleive your linked video is multi player.... not the massive open world campaign. Palworld runs better than campaign Halo Infinite. Also, running games above the vram limit, as seen in the video, causes massive stuttering and latency. It may look like a good idea on YouTube but doesn't work in the real world. Also, not directed at you, but the idea people can't tell the difference between low, medium and high settings is laughably absurd and flat out stupid. The difference is stark, immediately perceivable and blatantly obvious. I can't believe the nonsesense people convince themselves off. My wife (massive casual) and I have been playing campaign coop Halo Infinite. She is on the 3050 while I'm on the 4090 (which maxes Infinite without even trying) and it took her less than a minute to ask why her screen looked like crap. At the end of the day, anyone who is happy with 1080p 30 fps low settings has my 100% support, personal opnion and prefence. I'm just sick and tired of hearing that nobody can tell a difference... that is utter horse crap. |
Well, she maybe casual... but she's your wife. If anything, this just shows how your fixation for having the best visual performance subconsciously contaminated her. I bet if she wasn't overly stimulated seeing you playing, she would move along playing in her "crap" settings just fine. I bet even watching series you only choose those with 4k support lol
We reap what we sow
