the-pi-guy said:
I never said that you said any of these things. Tucker Carlson was pushing the same views as Fox News, having been one of the biggest people on the network, that's why I brought up the comparison.
Then why aren't you skeptical of the reasons why Tucker Carlson is going there? Why is your skepticism seeming to be so one sided? This is a consistent issue that I have with these kinds of questions. They're so frequently directed one way, while pretending to be unbiased. There are plenty of instances where the loser wrote history. For example, plenty of people believe false information about the confederacy.
Carlson is a mouthpiece for Russia-Ukraine propaganda. It's fairly relevant. |
Never said I wasn't skeptical of Tucker and have no idea if he is doing this for altruistic reasons. All I said was that he wasn't a traitor for doing an interview, and to wait for said interview to drop before we rush to conclusions.
1doesnotsimply