| DonFerrari said: NBA I don't know if there was none, but I know that Fifa had one (and possibly the agreement with Fifa was that at least one entry needed to be done). |
| DonFerrari said: You want sources for what exactly? |
So in other words, you're just making shit up without an ounce of proof, and you can't understand why anyone would want you to provide some sources on your claims.
| DonFerrari said: 3DS isn't a console and the license holders decide where they mandate it being put. |
Lol, here we go with the classic, "Handhelds aren't consoles when they don't fit my narrative" fallacy again. It's an electronic device that plays video games that require development time and budget just like any other console. It's got plenty of games on it that both its publisher and third parties included in their financial reports and decided whether and how to support it based on forecasts and projections. Many of those games share the same name as games on other consoles, and some are practically the same game. Some, like Castlevania: Lords of Shadow and Batman Arkham Origins had their own original versions that the publishers felt confident enough in to greenlight.
The 3DS is a console, one that plenty of publishers saw fit to put their games on. No publisher would tell Nintendo to their face that it wasn't. So why weren't those sports games
To further back up that point with FACTS, you said: "I know that Fifa had one (and possibly the agreement with Fifa was that at least one entry needed to be done)", and "3DS isn't a console and the license holders decide where they mandate it being put."
So... if EA was only contractually obligated to fart out one FIFA game per console, what are all of those above? Fan mods? And we know EA's relationship with Nintendo... and it was the license holder for FIFA during those years...
So what's your new spin for why Nintendo consoles keep getting new releases for games from big publishers if Nintendo users only buy Nintendo games?
