By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Phenomajp13 on 12 January 2024
Edit Thread
XtremeBG said:
Phenomajp13 said:

He's literally begging me for a fight right now lol. I haven't even called him a liar in this thread, yet he's dead set on starting this all over again. I already said what I needed to say in that very thread, you can go back and read it if you like. I never attacked him over his pestimistic prediction like he is trying to claim. I called him out about acting like he changed his prediction in the spring and yet found a post from him in spring (April) of him doubling down on that original prediction after telling Curl he changed it. So either he forgot or lied, I lean towards lied but that's just my opinion. 

I see it really got under your skin, I called you a liar for the events I mentioned above. The events went like this, you said looks like my earlier prediction of 4 million is correct. Curl correctly remembered your original prediction was 3 to 3.5 million. You replied to Curl saying you changed your prediction in spring when Switch was clearly doing much better. I then chimed in with a post of you saying in April, Switch will be closer to the DS's 2.9 million. I never found that post of your changing to 4 million, which is weird for someone claiming their prediction was changed. So if that post doesn't exist, is that not dishonest? You told us you changed your prediction yet I can't find anything suggesting you did but instead found something that says you didn't change your prediction.

First, you said dishonest and even quote me, So I answered. And no, this is not starting it over again, it is continuing it, cuz apparently you haven't learned you lesson and are again quoting me right and left and state almost the same thing as before " liar and dishonest " Also Why not mentioned the high 140s that I mentiond about the Switch but concentrate only on the low 150s ? So that you have what to hang on to again accuse me eh ? Also I asked you numerous times in my post which exactly is the lie, so I don't claim it is because of the pessimistic predictions but something else, that's why I asked you. You only switched the topics and never say in straight line. Now you did. So First of all you are saying you haven't saw me posting about 4M prediction, and then you are 100% sure I've said 4M before I wrote " close to 2.9M than to 3 someish ? " So you making statement here without you being sure if it's right or not. It looks to me you are looking to create things here out of you ass .. How did you now that the 4M post was written (if you haven't saw it) before my post of " closer to 2.9M " ?

Also I never said my prediction was changed exactly in April. I don't remember exactly which month was it, and what date, spring in my country runs to mid june. So the first post I've written 4M can be anywhere from April to June. I don't remember exactly when and I am not obliged to go and search for just to prove to you. However when you are making such a statement it's good to have everything showed up. You can't find post that I've written saying 4M, than it's your problem. You can't come out and call me a liar just becase you think out of thin air that I said 4M before I wrote the " closer to 2.9M ".

I know the event very well. and yes I replied that was to Curl. Also about the prediction of 4M. First of all as I said already, I write my prediction couple of times, not only once. People who are active here often probably have read my 4M prediction numerous times through out the year. When I've changed my prediction I didn't come out and say, " hey for all of you just to know I am changing the prediction " I just did a post where I've said something in the sort of that I can see Switch reaching 4M, or No more than 4M something like this. (I can't remember exact words cuz it has been probably 7-8 months since then but my posts often are written in this way. The fact that you can't find it is your problem. But this does not give you the right to call me dishonest or liar.

So all in all, you've followed and read something in some threads, and end up with the conclusion that I've first said 4M then went to my thread and said closer to 2.9M and even though you said already you haven't saw me saying 4M, I am liar and dishonest cuz all of that imaginery thing (according to you) has happened before my post about closer to 2.9M ?  Again no logic here ..

Clearly we are not understanding each other, because I have never cared about that 140 or 150s mess you keep bringing up. I don't care about your lifetime predictions, I only stated how you stated "no more than 150 million" and then says low 150s is possible. That's alittle different but I get what you mean. We can leave this at that, I have nothing more to say. We agree you meant around 150.

As for that last part, I don't know what you are talking about with that 4 million? I never said I saw you say that. I said I never found a shread of evidence you changed your prediction to 4 million. I don't believe you did but that's what you told Curl. I say your post in April (which is spring) of you doubling down on your original 3 to 3.5 million but you told Curl you changed it. That's what I am saying you are being dishonest about, you never changed your prediction to 4 million during spring. I can accuse you of lying because one I believe you are and two thats exactly what it looks like. Me not being able to find your post is suspicious and the reason why I through that word at you. I didn't make anything up, it looks more like that post just plain doesn't exist because I think I should have been able to find it. 

Edit: I see your last post and no that proves nothing because it doesnt prove you changed it. Regardless, Ill look in that thread.

Last edited by Phenomajp13 - on 12 January 2024