By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Doctor_MG said:
Chrkeller said:

Leaks are assumptions.  It isn't hard evidence.

Wind Waker on the switch was leaked from a 'reliable' source.....   

What Nintendo will or will not use is speculation.  Especially since underclocking is a real possibility like with the current model.

There is a big difference between a guy SAYING windwaker is coming and someone actually leaking the data via a hack that others can access with much of the data having already been proven correct at this point including game releases. 

Linux code also references T239.

The only part that's a rumor is whether or not T239 is in the Switch 2. Not whether T239 exists in general. Which means we can look at whether T239 is likely based on what we know of that chip and chips like it. 

Besides, I believe an Nvidia employee confirmed it's existence sometime last year or early this year. They explicitly stated T239. 

No point in wasting time on D&D (guess what that stands for), they're not interested (probably 1 person using an alt account at that) in having any kind of reasonable conversation. 

Like the same logic was used when I made a thread about reports of Switch 2 at Gamescom ("these rumorz are not true cuz if it was how cumz I no play Zelda Wind Waker now?" ... what kind of logic is this even, one thing has nothing at all to do with the other) and since then it's been crossed verified by multiple other sources that Switch 2 was indeed shown by Nintendo at Gamescom.