sc94597 said:
Sure, if we throw out the assumption that the Switch 2 is using T239, then anything is possible. I was addressing the point that Switch 2 could be T239 AND 8nm. The post I shared explains why underclocking might not even be an option. There is a point where you can't reduce power consumption anymore by reducing clocks. Because power consumption is mostly related to voltage, not clock speed, when you reduce clocks but keep the voltage the same, you don't really save much power. A large part of the power consumption called "static power" stays exactly the same, while the other part, "dynamic power", does fall off a bit. What you end up with is much less performance, but only slightly less power consumption. That is, power efficiency gets worse. |
I'll admit most of that is over my head. I'll take your word for it.