| Ryuu96 said: I really don't see how it's legal at all so I wouldn't be surprised if we see the legal route. How can Unity tell Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo to pay for games, based on licenses Unity formulated with other companies, companies which MS/Sony/Nintendo do not own, in any shape or form, or have a similar contract with Unity nor the company involved, nor did they ever place into these services contracts in the first place any mention of paying Unity. Microsoft did not as the distributor sign shit to pay Unity anything for games they don't own.
This too, Lol. They playing with Nintendo of all companies. |
The only way it works legally is if it's only for deals made from 2024 onwards, no way can it be legal to try and force subscription service owners to retroactively pay them back for the unique installs of Unity games that are already on their sub services.
