By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zeldaring said:
Soundwave said:

PS4 graphics are basically all we're getting. I don't see a big difference at all between FF7 Remake and FF16, they don't look like a completely different generation at all. They both look nice. 

To me, once we've reached this point in real time graphics rendering:

I'm good. They can only make a graphics demo with those graphics too because to make a full game like that, the cost is going to be ridiculous. Like studios in Japan certainly are not going to be able to afford that. 

I agree with you for the most part but 60fps/4k is worth the difference for me lol.  if you don't care about 4k and 60fps in multiplatform games you will be very happy, and nintendo games should look amazing at 30fps.

If you care about 4K 60 fps (or why stop there, why not 90 fps? 120 fps?) the only platform you should accept is a PC. 

Get that weak ass PS5 and XSX shit outta here. 

But no to me, playing PS4-tier graphics just at a higher resolution and double the frame rate isn't blowing my mind. I remember when generational leaps used to be like ... actual generational leaps. 

If the PS2 came out and it just played a PS1 game MGS at double the frame rate and resolution, like the system would've straight up tanked, lol. People expected a lot more from generational shifts back then. 

Even with Switch 2, they will I'm sure inevitably release BoTW/ToTK probably with 4K DLSS and 60 frames second, it's not like I'm going to fall off my couch in amazement, it'll be more like "eh, yeah, nice I guess".