By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave on 07 September 2023
Edit Thread
-Adonis- said:
Soundwave said:

The Switch is closer to the PS4 than people think it is. 

If the Switch 1 had DLSS, this comparison would become way, way closer because the blurry/low res look the Switch would suddenly become much closer to or right on par with the PS4. 

It's not like DOOM Eternal (or Witcher 3 or Wolfenstein) are like small scale indie games, those are basically like your standard big ticket 3rd party PS4 release. 

Without DLSS it can look like a blurry, muddy version and I think for a lot of devs that juice wasn't worth the squeeze, but if that wasn't the case, things become a whole lot dicier. If the Switch only had to render 1/9th the resolution of the PS4 and could still output a clean, high-res looking image ... it would turn comparisons like this upside down. 

It was all good until you use Doom as an example of a "good" port lol... I'm sorry textures and resolution are horrible. Why you ruined everything ?

That being said, I'm all for Final Fantasy VII Remake and FFXVI being ported on Switch 2. But Nintendo players, you better buy them if it comes. I want my favorite saga to have great sales. Same thing for Persona.

Which again is the whole point of DLSS. It will help resolve ports having to be laughably low res/muddy. 

If anything DLSS feels like a technology that Nvidia accidentally developed for a hybrid console just like the Switch, lol. 

Because really Nvidia doesn't want people saying "hey I can stick with my 2060 GPU and just use DLSS and not have to upgrade to a 40 series card" of course. 

The tech is like a godsend for the Switch.