KLXVER said:
At the end of the day its just opinions. I cant prove what I say is true and you cant prove what you say is true. We can only believe what we think might be true. Ill give you the WII U argument though. I admit that is a flawed argument from my part. |
Sure it’s opinions but we have the power of hindsight where we can look back and analyze various things that happened during previous generations to create informed opinions. Taking a single trend and ignoring the other variables isn’t a good way to come to a conclusion.
For 3DS & Wii U, I agree that their names were a factor as they did not do enough to indicate that they were brand new consoles, the average person could easily mistake 3DS for a DS revision with a 3D screen or think Wii U was a tablet accessory for Wii but there were clearly other very large issues on top of that so they would have had large declines regardless of name.
As for Super Nintendo & Gameboy Advance, I would really like to hear how those were poor names that contributed to their declines from NES/GB or why GameCube did so poorly despite having a completely unique name from previous consoles.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.







