By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
V-r0cK said:
Chrkeller said:

True.  I see your point.  However PC is BC with my current library and the hardware can be upgraded.  And PC has much better performance.  And it has a better selection of games.  And has better sales.  

There are pros nd cons for sure.  Either way I canceled the auto renew of my PSN.  $80 is absurd for online play.  Any games that have online components will be a PC buy, not ps5 

Edit

Also Retoarch is amazing....  talk about a selection of games.

Agreed PC is the best backwards compatible system there is but people are buying new consoles to play new games.  Backwards compatibility isn't a huge factor or else so many would complain about Nintendo.

PC has better performance, no doubt. However, personally it feels good to know when I play a game on a console I know it'll play to the best of its ability while some games on PC I'm not always sure it can run it smoothly but i suppose a $1100 rig that it should run all future games in the next 5yrs to run on max setting??

Better selection of games? That's questionable and preferences. If you can help me in this department, can you list me a number of PC exclusive games that better and aren't on Xbox or PS?

I do like you don't need to pay to play online with PC. I hated when Sony started implementing pay to play online because MS did first and it's been working.

Retoarch...so now you're adding emulation into the mix because these "better" PC exclusive games aren't enough?

PC doesn't have much in exclusives, but if Sony keeps porting and so does MS...  PC has Sony, MS and third party.  So my point was PC isn't hurting in terms of game selection.  

Retroarch is cool.  I just enjoy playing old classics from time to time.  Why pay for NSO when I can use retroarch?  Just personal preference I suppose.  

PC gaming has come a long way