Can't say I'm particularly surprised by the Starfield score, with anti-Xbox and anti-Bethesda bias going against it, was always going to score at least 5 points lower than it deserved to score. There is no way that the most polished game that Bethesda has ever produced, with deeper RPG systems than their last 2 singleplayer RPG's to boot, is actually an 87 game, one point lower than Fallout 4's 88. Without the anti-Xbox and anti-Bethesda bias this would be sitting on a 92-93 average most likely.
PC Gamer gave it a low review as expected, though surprisingly the other outlet that constantly attacked Starfield pre-release, Game Rant, gave it a 5/5. Guess the hate articles were nothing but a clickbait grift because they are struggling financially.
