The Problem with "Switch 2" pricing

[Chrkeller]

Soundwave said:

Chrkeller said:

Leaked isn't confirmed nor do we know if it will be under clocked.  Nor do we know about ram, etc.

The Pro never launched, period.  The leaks were fake, period.

We disagree, which is fine.  Let it be.

Maybe you could do like 2 minutes of research on the chip (Tegra T239), there's quite a bit known about it actually. 

The Pro is the OLED, the "leaks" were accurate in saying it would have an OLED display and they did get the exact screen size correct (if they guessed that by random happenstance then I guess they should go play the lottery too with that kind of luck), they just got confused with Switch 2 as well and assumed it was one product which is not an unreasonable mistake to make. Saying "all leaks are false forever and ever because of that" is just dumb in my view.

You also do understand that just because you "downclock" a chip doesn't mean you get it for a cheaper price, right? Like if the Tegra T239 is a 3 TFLOP chip and Nintendo decides to cripple it "because Nintendo!" to 1 TFLOP, they're still paying for the 3 TFLOP chip, that's not Nvidia's problem. 

I don't doubt the T239 exists.  I'm saying we don't know if Nintendo is going to use it.  Even if they do we don't know the version nor clock speeds.  We don't know, full stop.

People who insisted the pro was real are laughable for claiming the OLED counts as the pro.  Those who insisted the Pro was real were simply wrong, full stop.

One last question on my side.  With the switch did Nintendo reduce the clock speed of their chipset?  I'm looking for a simple yes or no.