By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Legit impressed by Baldur's Gate 3 performance, it made it up to 9th place on the all-time peak concurrent players rankings for Steam, and 4th place looking at games that are singleplayer or primarily singleplayer, behind only Cyberpunk 2077, Elden Ring, and Hogwarts Legacy. With these kind of sales, Larian should be able to go properly AAA on their next game if they choose to. I just hope that Sony doesn't decide to snatch them up to compete with Xbox's WRPG dominance between Bethesda, Obsidian, inXile, and Playground RPG studio, or that Larian refuses to sell if Sony does make an offer.

Shame that it's looking like we will have to wait until 2024 to play it on Xbox. The lack of compromise from both parties is what lead to this sadly, Larian was unwilling to compromise and delay splitscreen on both S and X until they could find a way for S to run splitscreen at an acceptable framerate, while Xbox was unwilling to grant them a special exception to their S and X feature parity rule by allowing Larian to delay splitscreen on S only. What hurts the most is knowing that splitscreen, a feature likely used by less than 10% of modern gamers, is what lead to this delay.

The only thing that lessens the sting of having to wait until at least January to play Baldur's Gate 3 is that we Xbox owners get to play Starfield a week after what would have been the PS5 and Xbox Series release week for BG3. Thankfully Starfield is looking to be a massive game that I will likely sink at least 200 hours into on my first playthrough, as you can easily sink 200 hours into Skyrim and Bethesda has suggested that Starfield is bigger than Skyrim in terms of main+side content. So Starfield should keep me busy for most of the rest of the year, while other late 2023 releases I want to play like AC Mirage, Forza Motorsport, and Avatar should be able to keep me busy the rest of the wait for BG3 on Xbox hopefully.

Last edited by shikamaru317 - on 07 August 2023