By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
abronn627 said:

Or simply that they have a better grasp than Ubisoft on how to properly push a product like Mario+Rabbids?

It’s the kind of game that capitalize on a softer release schedule and would have benefited from the post launch calendar of the future system.

But it’s Ubisoft and like any AAA publishers, they’re dependent on their returns on investment ASAP and can’t hold on finished product like Nintendo does.

I don't think Nintendo would suggest it if the next system wasn't reasonably near by, like otherwise it's kind of a dick suggestion (lol), "hold on for years and years before making another one". 

They probably saw "oh ok, so you want to release it in 2023 ... well Super Switch is (for example) 2024, why not just wait the 12-16 months" type of thing. 

I mean, if you’re looking for signs of the imminent release of the new system, be my guest.

I’m just seeing signs of Nintendo being aware of the brand appeal, while Ubisoft wasn’t.

Great game, but more dependent on the better release conditions than anything else. Even if that means holding onto it for 12-18 or even 36 months (who knows). 

Ubi should have waited.