Soundwave said:
Thing is I think Nintendo felt the same thing about 3DS. "Wow, people are willing to pay $199.99 for the DSi XL, surely they'll easily pay $250 for the 3DS". They didn't just randomly pull $250 out of their ass, they thought it would be easy to sell at that price because people were buying DSi XL's for $199, surely $250 for a 3DS that was a full upgrade + 3D screen would be easy peasy. Now sure, maybe times have changed, but I would expect Nintendo to not be too cocky, memories of their senior staff are long and they'll remember full well what happened with the 3DS and Wii U. |
That’s not the same thing at all. I said as long as the successor isn’t way more expensive and doesn’t focus on a gimmick that people don’t want than cross-gen titles shouldn’t hurt sales.
DSi XL wasn’t $199.99 when 3DS launched, it was $169.99. 3DS at $249.99 was ~47% more expensive than the most expensive DS sku. People didn’t care enough about a 3D screen to pay the extra money.
On top of that, 3DS had a terrible launch/post-launch lineup.
March-Nintendogs & Pilotwings
June-Ocarina of Time 3D
September-Star Fox 64 3D
That’s the equivalent of
Switch 2-$499.99
Power Glove required
launch titles-Ring Fit Adventure 2 & Wave Race
post launch titles-Twilight Princess 4K & Star Fox Assault 4K
So yeah if that’s what Switch 2 looks like than I don’t see it doing too well.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.







