By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JEMC said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Simulated Radeon RX 7800 XT GPU ends up 4% to 13% faster than RX 6800 XT

https://videocardz.com/newz/simulated-radeon-rx-7800-xt-gpu-ends-up-4-to-13-faster-than-rx-6800-xt

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8 GB Graphics Card Confirmed To Launch on 29th June For $299 US

https://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4060-8-gb-graphics-card-confirmed-launch-29th-june-299-usd/

*slide*

Most likely it will be better to get the 3060 12GB for less or RDNA 2 offerings. I would focus on the "without frame gen" section but even then, I'd take it with a grain of salt until real reviews come out.

I really hope the 7800XT ends up being faster than that, otherwise it will be a disappointment unless AMD prices it really well.

As for the 4060... yeah, I remember the slides Nvidia provides with the 4060Ti. Therefore, I have zero faith in that one.

If it comes with just 70 CU, which are 2 less than on it's predecessor, then I don't expect a big jump either, but I do expect a couple more percentages here and there.

Also, considering the disparity is pretty big between 1080p and 4K, not sure I can really trust their methodology all that much. Those 4% in 1080p were enough to beat the 6900XT too btw - PCGH has 12% difference between the 6800XT and the 6950XT at 1080p, so having the 6900XT within 3% of the 6800XT seems very dubious to me.