Currently Online 
| the-pi-guy said: It's funny seeing Apple basically eat Meta's lunch on two different levels. From a marketing standpoint, and arguably from a tech standpoint. On the marketing standpoint, it's kind of funny seeing people suddenly get more interested in AR/VR. They've benefitted a lot from avoiding Meta's pitfalls. It's funny because Meta has been working on a lot of this stuff for years now, but Apple is the one to show millions of people what the tech can actually do for them; and in a real device even if it's too pricey for most people. It's a little harder to say if Meta is actually behind tech wise. Apple and Meta have been showing opposite approaches. Apple is basically putting out a great high end headset, and their goal is to make it cheaper. Whereas Meta's strategy has been to make a low end headset and make it better. The Vision Pro is better in most areas than the Quest 2 and the Quest Pro, and it should be since it costs 10x more than the former and 3.5x more than the latter currently. It would be interesting if the response to the Vision Pro convinced Meta to make a better Quest Pro that actually pushed Meta's tech. There seems to be a lot they're holding out on due to a variety of factors like price. I will guarantee though that Apple is ahead when it comes to software (UI and apps). That's been a big issue with Meta frankly... |
Is this a joke post?.. Its the only way i think you could think that this in any way has done anything to the Quest 3's market. Or if you even think this thing will sell 2 million like the quest 2 and i bet soon to be quest 3.
Its also funny you now think so many people are interested in AR/Vr only nnow thanks to apple?. this has to be a joke post am i right?.
