smroadkill15 said:
It was not clear if something is a timed exclusive, full exclusive, or multiplatform when it came to 3rd party games. Sony seems to change the wording or way it tells us this each time I watch one of these shows. I read plenty of comments during the show and after asking if a certain game is exclusive or not. Why does it need to be informed minutes after the show? Because it's the best time to do it while people are still talking the games. It gets people thinking about Xbox. It's smart and effective marketing. |
They said coming to Playstation, without any exclusiveness disclaimer so it was pretty obvious they weren't exclusive in any form.
Again as I said I don't remember Sony putting reminders or disclosures for multiplatform titles after MS announcements.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
