Pemalite said:
Correct. Which is why I never asserted anything like you have.
Nintendo never competed against the Dreamcast. That is a fact.
They already have changed the industry.
Let's not falsely assume, let's actually base things on evidence.
You still aren't reading my posts. How does Microsoft being a trillion dollar company have anything to do with porting software to server hardware?
That is a policy that can change later on as it's not officially endorsed.
|
1) Okay.
2) Nintendo had Sega as a major competitor with the Mega Drive and Genesis, it was healthy competition when it was two major platforms. Sony entered, Sega instantly struggled, there was no room for Sega to compete. Look at the history of the console market. There has always been 2 major platforms and the 3rd platform changes from company to company. You have seen it with your own eyes.
3) EGS hasn't changed the market, not the way you are thinking they did. Let me ask you, what did EGS change exactly for the better? EGS tried to lower Steams cut on games and failed. Steam still takes 30% (With the exception of high end sales). Why does Steam need to take a less cut on games? For what purpose does this benefit the consumers? Your example of Discord was a poor one. In what world is Discord a Steam competitor?
4) So you are saying Sony don't want Bethesda's big games? I would say my point is more in favor than yours.
5) MS is already making deals with other Streaming services to play Xbox games, so where is this hard porting process you continue to bring up? From what we are seeing, is they have signed multiple 10+ year deals with other services to play Xbox games, so where's the porting issue? I dont understand this point? If Nvidia can Stream Xbox games, so can PS and Nintendo.
6) Assumption. You cannot run a business on assumptions.
7) Maybe when they announce and release some new games maybe...
Last edited by Azzanation - on 20 May 2023