I think a lot of this thread boils down to:
a) People who think Nintendo can make some great games *because* of hardware limitations (forcing developers to focus on creativity, etc.)
b) People who think Nintendo can make great games *despite* said limitations.
I'm on the second camp because the weaksauce hardware is just a consequence of their market strategy focusing on features other than graphics to sell at a lower price.
I feel if the Switch was much more powerful, it would have cost over $500 and sold a lot less or retailed at a loss. Nintendo would have been hard-pressed to release their games faster and not as polished. This alternate-universe Zelda might have been not much better overall than ours... but not because Aonuma spent his hours cranking up draw distance instead of coming up with Ultrahand or whatever.
So it's just some fun imagining what more could have been done, really (as one can do to any game). People just want the same thing you enjoy to have been better, so no point in getting tilted.
