| IcaroRibeiro said: I think people who don't bother by the difference do not play much AAA western games |
Or people who aren't bothered about it, simply can't be bothered about it? I can notice the difference, but it doesn't flip any sentiment about wanting to have a better visual performance. If in the future they decide to rerelease the game for switch 2, great, but what is available visually now is more than enough for me.
If I look for it, yeah I can definitely see the low quality texture, but while immersed in the game, the world setting is so beautifully executed that I can't be bothered with thoughts about Nintendo needing to step up in the graphics department
VAMatt said:
Who is talking about photorealism? I don't think anyone wants, and certainly nobody expects that from Nintendo games like Zelda. But, there's a lot more to graphics than that. |
When you talk about the game needing a better foliage, isn't like craving for realism in a sense?
Btw, I know that. That's why I have listed visual performance and photorealism as 2 separate things
Last edited by 160rmf - on 19 May 2023
We reap what we sow







