crissindahouse said:
The problem I see is that Russia can also withdraw some troops from Bakhmut itself if they have taken it completely. They can strengthen their flanks more then. Right now they are still in the "let's waste hundreds of soldiers a day for a few buildings more" mode but they will lose less of them if they don't have buildings (or rubble) left to take. Russia trying so hard to take this city was the best which could happen to Ukraine (well, Russia's equipment losses in Vuhledar were maybe even better lol). Just defending what's left will be easier I guess. Sure, if Ukraine can manage to encircle the city to get the city back even without capturing Russians it would be a big L for Russia but I guess encircling it when it's 100% in Russia's hands will cost more Ukrainians lives as if Ukraine would be still in the city. But I'm not a military strategist. I just think it will help Russia a little bit to occupy 100% of what's left of Bakhmut and not only 95% or whatever. |
Well if that's the case then let's hope Russia keeps up with their brute stupidity regarding Bakhmut. It'd reduce their troop numbers enough that Ukraine would have an even better chance of driving those genocidal pigs in migs out.