IcaroRibeiro said:
Money hating is okay, doesn't bother be. The developers and publishers still an independent company and can choose whatever they want. They will be the ones making the profits too, so they kinda balance the power in the market Buying out other companies however is predatory. I wish regulators were more rigorous when blocking this kind of acquisitions. Microsoft has enough studios already, Zenimax acquisition already granted them many big titles. They shouldn't be able to buy another big publisher. |
Its not a question of what bothers you, I am saying what bothers a business. For MS, as a business and in 3rd place, the investment to out money hat Sony is steep. The market leader gains an advantage because as long as they can make these deals at a much cheaper rate, it takes twice the capitol for MS to to even compete. So for MS, what is best for them, trying to match Sony and paying 100 million dollars for a year of exclusive which mind you was the going rate a while ago compared to taking that company out of the picture.
What does it mean if its a publisher or a bunch of studios, its pretty much the same thing. If Sony purchase 5 studios would that equal to most publishers output. Either way, as far as I am concerned, I am only looking at the landscape. 3rd party lockout deals always favor the platform with the biggest install base than the smaller one because you can easily wait until that game releases but if you are the market leader it helps more to protect your market share as consumers would be less inclined to leave when they get things first.
For each OEM, any of these companies purchase a studio its off the board for another platform and none of it has anything to do with how gamers feel. None of them care, they care about their business and you as the consumer only benefit as long as competition remains strong among them all.