KazumaKiryu said: Why is Shikamaru omitting the background and not mentioning Microsoft's payment for the US politician? |
If it's not in the article I was posting, I didn't omit anything. I see nothing in that article about Xbox paying off US politicians. They have almost certainly donated to many politician's campaigns, all the big corporations do, but campaign donations are not quite the same as bribing government officials for quid pro quo benefits, that would be illegal if Microsoft did that.
Xbox is both creating their own big games and acquiring others. They have staffed up most of their studios by a substantial amount over the last few years, some staffing up from AA size to a more AAA capable size.
It was actually Sony who excluded Nintendo from the market first, not Microsoft. Sony told regulators that Nintendo competes for a different subset of consumers than Playstation and Xbox do, after Xbox cited Switch's success in spite of CoD not releasing on it as proof that Sony doesn't truly need CoD. Their own made up "high-end console market" term is being used against them now.
Sony did buy a good many studios during the PS2 era, Guerilla, Naughty Dog, Bend Studio, Incognito Entertainment, and Zipper Interactive were acquired by Sony during the 2000-2006 life of PS2. They didn't buy more than they did not because the regulators wouldn't allow it, but because they didn't believe buying more would be a worthwhile investment. At that time Sony still preferred their other divisions to Playstation and were spending more on them, it was shortsighted and cost them somewhat in the long run.