Torillian said:
That's impressive Happy, someone comes with a dildo jerkish statement, and you out dildo them. I bow down to your mastery. |
Thanks, I try to practice as much as possible ...
As I said earlier, I was trying to put CrazzyMan's statment into perspective in terms he would understand; making a comment using raw numbers doesn't work because all CrazzyMan understands is "PS3 = Good, XBox 360 = Bad, Wii = Worse" so if you show something he is bashing is better than the PS3 he has difficulty defending his position.
Now, to put this into perspective using numbers:
In a typical year in Japan there are only a handful (5 to 10) games that ever sell more than 500,000 units, which means there are few games that could have an active userbase over 500,000 6 months after it was released. When you combine this with the fact that most of these 500,000 selling games are not multiplayer games and have very limited replay value, which means that there are probably only a couple of games that have ever had this level of usage 6 months after release.
How can you claim something is "Negative Wii News" when it is demonstrating something that few (if any) games have ever accomplished before?
