JWeinCom said:
Eh, not sure if it was intended that way, but this comes off as very condescending and presumptuous. If McDonalds was charging 10 bucks for a 4 piece McNuggets, I wouldn't buy them. That doesn't mean I don't have 10 dollars to spare, just that I don't think 10 dollars is a good value for 4 McNuggets. Likewise, the fact that I won't be spending 550 for PSVR2 doesn't necessarily mean that I couldn't. How much disposable income I actually have is something that you don't know and isn't any of your business anyway, so you probably shouldn't be commenting about that. ^_^ |
No I didn't mean to be condescending and I apologize if it came off that way. No I really believe that you yourself set the rules on what you can afford and what you can't. Having tried the VR2 I can say that it is worth the money because the experience that it provides is suitably premium. Trust me when I say it's not something that can ever be conveyed through a flat screen video. Playing RE8 is not the same. It is better, it is scarier and you cant get flat games to invoke that kinda response. GT7 is a revelation. I had no idea. There is no way I would have known. Even Pavlov and Star Wars are absolutely incredible.
So while you have the right to not be interested, it is just wrong to say it's only worth $200. I can say that confidently because the tech inside is what makes it possible And when you hopeful have the chance to experience it I think you will automatically be converted. But I thought you were saying that you didn't have the money which is more than understandable. These are luxury items. They don't come before other stuff and they aren't necessary at all.
Apologies for the confusion and rock on!
