Machiavellian said:
Maybe its just me but it seems like a lot of people are missing the context of what is going on. The EU gave reasons in a nice document how MS could acquire ABK. They did not list Nintendo, NA or the PC. They specifically mentioned Sony and the potential lock out of COD on Sony console. What this mean is that putting anything in that talks about anothe country would be foolish since these are regulators for the EU. Putting anything that talks about another platform that was not mentioned as being hurt by the deal would be foolish as it does not progress your point. The focus of the arguments should be on exactly what is being contested to limit the scope of their arguments. So no, they should not include the PC, Nintendo or anything else that was not contested and only focus on the points brought up by the regulators in their report. |
So why did they put Japan, Worldwide and included last gen?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







