Darashiva said:
The difference is, whether you agree with Sterling or not, is that they are a professional critic who covers video games for a living. You don't have to agree with the review or the score, but you also can't disregard it because of that. Looking at the review itself and the conclusion, I think this line from the review matches the score Sterling gave the game quite well: Metroid Prime Remastered is a faithful beat-for-beat recreation of the GameCube classic with a comprehensively polished visual makeover. It remains a solid adventure shooter, even if its straightforward approach to player progress is a little unexciting these days. Also, which part of the review is based on deliberate false stuff? I haven't played the game myself, so maybe there is, but I took a look at the review and couldn't find anything that stood out as false. |
Sterling's reviews in general are often written in a very unprofessional way full of profanity and ranting. They are annoying to read.







