It's really not that good a poll. The number of respondants are fine. Really, 1000 people is good enough to estimate the population, given that it's a random sample. Readers of one and the same magazine is usually not what I would call a random sample.
Then the poll misses out on how long people have owned the Wii Fit, that's to be considered an important factor as well.
Finally, it's an internet poll. Are they ever reliable?
So in the end, the poll doesn't really tell us anything, other than that out of the people reading that magazine (online?) responding to that poll, 22% use their wii fit regularly, not considering when or for how long they have owned it, and 64% never really played it. More information than we had before, but not really relevant.
This is invisible text!
