the-pi-guy said:
There's a whole bunch of things to consider. Rol already said this in many more words. But where would it end? If we show Russia and China and anyone else that we're not going to put up a fight if someone threatens nuclear weapons, where will that end? It wouldn't with Ukraine. It wouldn't end with Taiwan. If you show a narcissist that they can just take without a fight, they will continue just taking. I think there's a big difference in how advantageous it is threating to use them vs actually using them. Threatening to use them certainly seems advantageous because people are terrified. Actually using them though, doesn't seem very advantageous. That would likely mean losing everything you were fighting for. |
That probably sums up my feelings. Where does appeasement end? Should we all submit to the will of Moscow and Beijing just to keep the peace in the world? What, exactly, would "concessions" from Ukraine look like? Giving up the territory that was illegally seized from them by Putin? Withdrawing any attempts to join NATO, I suppose. I suspect that Russia would settle for nothing less than Kyiv's absolute obedience to Moscow's whims.
Hungary is under the rule of Viktor Orban, who is content to be a Putin puppet. There's also a huge authoritarian streak running through the Hungarian people. Freedom is too messy for them, therefore they seem to prefer dictatorship so long as it's aimed at the people they consider "undesirables." Unfortunately, a lot of Republicans in the United States see Orban as a model for Republican governance, as he was a keynote speaker at CPAC in Texas last year.