Ryuu96 said:
Wouldn't mind Amazon since they'd likely keep them multiplatform, I don't think Amazon would change anything with Ubisoft's structure though which I think would be a bad thing, Ubisoft is in desperate need of a leadership shakeup. Tencent is definitely the frontrunner though, Yves is doing everything he can to stay in power and seems to have chosen Tencent to allow that, I see Tencent and Yves making more moves together in the future. I also think Embracer would be allowed to merge with Ubisoft but I can't see it happening. Honestly, Jeff is likely right, Ubisoft for its 20,000 employees never really pulled huge profits in comparison to how massive it was. Its strengths were its workforce who are reportedly jumping from the company now due to toxic work environments and its IPs which its strongest ones are no longer releasing on a consistent basis. They still do have strong IPs and a large workforce but they're way less consistent now. I think Ubisoft makes a lot more sense for someone who doesn't already have a large publishing operation & strong IPs (I.E. Amazon) than they do for someone who already has a large publishing operation & strong IPs (I.E. Xbox & PlayStation). Ubisoft would be lucky to go for over $10bn at this rate. They've now dropped to $2.8bn. Their market cap is now less than Sega, Lol. Sony could afford them but I don't see why they would go for them, their net income isn't that impressive for how massive they are and if Sony made their games exclusive it would be a lot worse. |
I saw a tweet from Grubb yesterday saying that Ubisoft had already reached out to people in regards to acquisitions and mergers, but that they were pretty much laughed at. Nobody wants them atm