| Chrkeller said: Runs fine. My kids love it and haven't complained once. The switch can't run pokemon to the level of your want. This isn't that difficult. CLEARLY the average gamer doesn't care about technical performance, or the switch wouldn't be so successful. Technical performance is a want by core gamers. It isn't a need because the masses don't care. Could you imagine if I said all cars need 400 horsepower to go 0 to 60 in 4 seconds, and any car that doesn't is a technical failure? And proceeded to play that off as a fact that everyone has to accept and agree too? |
No. It's objectively bad. - You just have low standards, unless you are asserting that Digital Foundry are telling lies?
I suggest you watch the digital foundry video that breaks down all the performance and technical issues.
Here it is again:
As for your car analogy... It's incorrect.
With the Switch I am not suggesting it needs to be identical to all other cars on the market like the Series X and Playstation 5, heck even older cars like the Xbox One and Playstation 4.. And that it's inability to go to 0 to 60 in 4 seconds somehow makes it "bad".
I have no issue with the Switch's current performance, provided games run perfectly fine on them.
It would be more like having a little Toyota Camry, 4 cylinder. - But the issue is, when you reach legal highway speeds, regardless of how long it takes you to get there, the steering starts to shake and wobble and the vehicle starts to feel "unsafe" at it's "rated" speed... And that is where a newer model can resolve those issues.
We are consumers, we are handing cash over for these products, we should demand and expect the best possible product, not give excuses... You are only damaging the consumers position. - And for what?
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
