KLXVER said:
Fair enough. I just dont think a more focus on indies would do much. Like the Nintendo Direct Indies doesnt get anywhere near the attention a regular Direct does. Its just not as popular as the AAA games. If Stray didnt get nominated for GOTY this year, almost no one would care. But if Elden Ring or GOW Ragnarok hadnt been nominated, people would scratch their heads and wonder WTF was going on? Maybe it would be better to have a seperate award show for each? I dont know. That would kinda seem like Indies arent good enough to be counted as real games. But one thing I know for sure. The award show with the AAA games would crush the ratings of the indie show. Thats just how it is. |
I mean, that's it right there... How often do you simply see "best song of the year" or "best movie of the year" without there being a category or genre attached to it? This is why you always see things like "best action movie of the year" or something, so that even if action movies are the money-makers and most common, there is still a romance comedy or something getting exposure for being the best in its category.
If anything, perhaps there should no longer be a singular GAME of the year, ever. This would then mean that there's ALWAYS an indie game winning every year because there's always an Indie GOTY section for one to come out on top of. If there was to be a middle-ground change to it all where you and I can agree, then that would probably be it. Indie GOTY, Action Adventure GOTY, RPG GOTY, etc. etc. As it is right now, those separate categories are simply "awards", but never given the spotlight compared to "GOTY". So that's probably the easiest middle ground answer: there is no singular top award anymore.







