The US is ranked as a 'Flawed Democracy', what needs to change?

[RolStoppable]

ConservagameR said:

RolStoppable said:

Apparently you didn't learn anything. I don't think you can produce a credible source that points to the culprit being more of a liberal than a fan of right wing conspiracies.

the-pi-guy said:

Uh what? That actually happened, his daughter confirmed that he wrote those things.

Elon Musk replied with an article that claimed that the person was a gay prostitute that Pelosi just had an argument with. That's called spreading misinformation, it's not fighting it.

Hiku said:

So where did you get the information that made you think"There is far more pointing to him being a liberal"?

You need to give a direct answer to this question.
Link us to where you read/heard this, and explain which parts convinced you of this. As I did you the courtesy of not only linking to his blog, but also highlighting the content that unquestionably reveals that he couldn't be further from liberal.

Pelosi attacker David DePape was psychotic addict estranged from pedophile lover & kids (nypost.com)

Accused Paul Pelosi attacker David DePape could be deported (cnbc.com)

Don't mind the NY Post headline, it talks much about his likely political views. Plenty more but no need to overdo it

BTW, those weren't my initial sources. My initial sources would very likely have been considered non credible, yet credible sources have covered it. That is of course, if my links are from credible sources. I guess we'll see. RolStoppable made sure to include the credibility factor, as that's typically the excuse given as to why certain sources findings of facts aren't useful. What's a credible source and what isn't seems to change sometimes and is difficult to pin down here.

It's pretty hard to counter the culprit's own blog when determining his political views.

Regarding credible sources, it isn't difficult to determine what's credible and what is not. The first thing that stuck out in the New York Post link was the headline tag "Opinion" which is generally used to separate proper journalism from a mere opinion piece that isn't obligated to stick to all the facts at hand. Said opinion published in the NYP has a clear direction of proving something while leaving out the most crucial piece of evidence, which is the culprit's own blog. If the NYP were convinced that the author's work is credible, then the publication wouldn't separate itself from the author, because that's the point of labeling something as an opinion: The written piece does not reflect the stance of the publication, but solely the author's.

The CNBC article is proper journalism, but it makes no mention of a possible left-leaning political affiliation of the culprit. I can only guess that you think that someone who could be deported must automatically be a supporter of the democrats.