By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Renamed said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes production is tight. But situation of PS improving doesn't indicate Switch also improving and vice-versa, they don't use same production lines.

Depending on factors it could even be the opposite, PS is improving because manufacturers replaced lines that were used by Switch with lines that are used by PS/Xbox.

Manufacturing tends to be contact based.  They can't just drop a console for another unless the contract is renegotiated and I don't see Nintendo cutting their contract terms just so Sony can have their manufacturing line space. 

I don't disagree with you, although there is also the possibility of Nintendo forecasting less shipment than current year on their contract. But again, my point was just that the situation improving for one wouldn't automatically mean it is improving for the other one as well.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."