By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zero129 said:
DonFerrari said:

Haven't seem outrage threads on VGC complaining about GTA V (I have seem complains about not having GTAVI news, but this much vitriol against R* nope I haven't and they are having slug pacing since ever), and none painting MS as a greedy corporation for Skyrim Switch being 70USD or the fact that they have basically not releasing a new Elder Scrolls for a long long time.

Would you point me these threads? Would be even better to see you complaining on it together with some key people.

You dont need a thread when you have articles and forum posts announcing the games and then you see people in them threads complaining.

Hell the time Skyrim PS5 XBSX version was announced i did complain about it being a miner upgrade and how i thought it was going to have ray tracing etc. But then like i said since it was a QOA upgrade i got that for free since i already owned the base game.

Like i said stop being so selective with your memory and come out from under that rock. Skyrim has been memed to death and back. What more complaining do you need?. And as for the switch price that is shitty. But like you and other Sony fans have been saying the market will choose to buy it or not.

Ironic to see you complaining about a price when you dont do the same for Sony charging more for games, upping their console price Very ironic.

We don't need, but curiously for the Sony remasters even when they are rumor we get them right? You got Skyrim for free on PS5?

Yes I still hold that market will decide. You think otherwise, similarly with people that makes the threads to complain about pricing on PS5, still no thread was made to complain about this...

Have I complained about Skyrim price? Nope, I asked where is the thread complaining about it. And in fact I complained about the price of TLOU Part 1, and that as a customer it was unnecessary, while saying I do understand why they made the remake and why it was priced 70 (first being that it would sell well and second that they wouldn't release it for PS as 40USD and PC for 70, so they gone for since it is first release on PC go with price of new game).

On then rising the price of the console, I again said I don't like it, but with console being sold out and inflation it would hardly impact the sales of the console and Sony would try to maximize profit so again not desirable but understandable strategy (and in that case I even asked about the complains over Oculus Rift rising price, or MS that had rose price on India, and Nintendo that done a stealth rise with OLED and have a 5 year old system without price cut... none of these of course had the same complains).

So the not ironic is I knew you would try this type of deflection.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."