Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[Bofferbrauer2]

Captain_Yuri said:

Intel Arc A770/A750 Graphics Card Review Roundup

https://videocardz.com/139545/intel-arc-a770-a750-graphics-card-review-roundup

1080p:

1440p:

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-arc-a770/32.html

Ray Tracing:

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-arc-a770/34.html

Performs pretty horribly on older games tho:

https://www.techspot.com/review/2542-intel-arc-a770-a750/

You forgot the 4K graph:

It feels like GCN 1 or 2 again, when AMD needed higher resolutions to get it's raw performance to the ground.

Also the Raytracing performance is quite nice, they weren't kidding when they compared it favorably to NVidia's inclusion.

Too bad the Arc GPUs are horrible in older DX versions (the older, the worse it gets) and under OpenGL, but if you don't play older games (or are a retro gamer who plays very much older games where the performance hit isn't an issue anymore).

These are actually fine mid-range cards, with one caveat: The consume way too much power for the performance.

Using more power than an RX 6800 while delivering much less performance is unacceptable in this regard. And with the way the power bills are going, this is also a very bad time to not be power-efficient.

The Arc GPUs will have a difficult stand: They consume too much power, which is relatively important in this day and age, but not necessarily a dealbreaker. Then, there's the question with the drivers and support, how well will they be down the road. Most eSport titles still use DX11 or older, where the GPU doesn't deliver nearly enough performance, so those will most certainly pivot to other GPUs. Finally, AMD gives more performance at lower resolutions with the RX 6600XT while also being cheaper in general (starting at ~$300 for 6600XT, ~$250 for the 6600; while the A770 is $349 and the A750 $289 MSRP), making the price somewhat unappealing.