By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
SecondWar said:

Really why states shouldn’t get to vote on matters they are involved in, including at the Security Council. Then it will just go to the general assembly thiugh. But really at this point the UN is a talking shop akin to the League of Nations.

I think it's more proof that vetos shouldn't exist. It was a 10-1 vote, and the 1 won. So democratic!

I think vetos are fine so that you won't have as example a situation in which some countries close to each other could just do "what they want" but it should be at least some more vetos needed and the country which it is about should not be able to vote. Regardless if it's USA, Russia or whatever. As if a country would vote against itself wtf.