| DonFerrari said: I pointed more at once that the reviews (both critics and users) weren't good. And on the metacritic thread about SoT you were talking about the reviewers being wrong and the game being great, and if I'm not wrong you entered some metacritic threads of PS games to defend the reviewers that gave low scores. I haven't pretended I did at any moment, and that is different than you that pretend to have played all PS5 exclusives, which you hated by standard while not having a console or account "I played all of them at a cousin". So don't you user ruler on others. Anyway, if now you understand I was talking about how the game was poor at launch, that being ambitious doesn't make a game good, and that would be hard for SoT to be less ambitious than their games on SNES I don't have anything else to add. As I said, I'm glad you recognized several of the games were poorly handed by MS and you want external devs to work on them, even if you can't directly recognize it. |
No you did not, that is a complete lie. You stated that SoTs wasn't good when i said SoTs is a very ambitious game. No reviews or scores were mentioned. You just flat out said the game wasn't good.
Show evidence of your claims Don, i am calling you out on it. When did i say reviews are wrong? I also have the right to like SoTs like the other millions who liked it. I even stated in this very thread that i don't disagree with the reviews on release of SoTs. Also Rare made games on the Gamecube and Xbox, have you been living under a rock? SNES? What kind of garbage response is that.
Where did i say MS poorly handled their IPs? Evidence? You have to be trolling with these assumptions Don. You better have evidence to back up your claims.
Essay Pro