The_Liquid_Laser said:
"Playstation is still more affordable than Switch unless you only buy games on release" For the most part, no, this is wrong. First there is the very obvious $500 for PS5 vs. $300/$350 for Switch. Secondly, third party games on Switch do tend to come down in price. It is mostly the first party games that stay high in price and even there Nintendo runs discounts regularly for people who want that. |
So you ignore inflation for PS5 price (that launched at loss and base model at 400 USD), ignores that Switch is a lot weaker as console, and ingnore a plethora of titles from 3rd party simply skip Switch just to fit your point.... ok. I guess PS isn't for you.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."