By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
Azzanation said:

Thats the problem with your debate. You assume not being ambitious makes the games bad. 

Rare are not known for releasing sequels after sequels. Even under Nintendo, they move on to new IPs and game designs. Thats why they have one of the most colourful collections of IPs in the industry. Weather they come out good is debatable however thats their buisness structure.

Rare simply dont make those type of platformers anymore. 

You are the one twisting things to try are correct your post, sorry.

But yes I can agree with you that even if you claim SoT was an ambitious game it certainly wasn't good.

Twisting? Twisting what exactly? Seems you are trying to take this thread off course. But ill digress with your tactics.

SoT was claimed by Rare themselves as the most ambitious game they ever made.

What didnt you like about SoTs, curious to hear your personal experience on it..

Last edited by Azzanation - on 02 August 2022