Ljink96 said: Kinda late to the party but...I mean, Sony is doing something right. They're the market leader by revenue year after year. But I also have preferences. I'm just not a fan of the types of games Sony makes these days. And I think that's a sentiment a lot of gamers have. That doesn't necessarily mean what Sony is doing is wrong for their business. Sony's current IP slate is selling very well. Sony Japan studios were putting out games that just didn't sell. Developing games isn't a charity. People have to get paid to keep making more games that you like. And unfortunately, for some, those types of experiences aren't of priority for Sony anymore. 3rd parties and Indies now pick up the torch that was dropped by Sony's past 1st party outings. |
Yes, being unhappy or felling left out is perfectly normal. Asking Sony to diversify their output and invest a little more in some genres/devs is also healthy and they need to hear. The mistake (not yours) is thinking Sony is making a mistake on their investment when the numbers clearly show the opposite.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."