Chrkeller said:
So to answer the question I asked, Nintendo in fact doesn't currently do lootboxes and MTX. Thanks, that was my point. For the record I happily bash putting content behind Amibos. I happily bash having to pay for online, same as I do for Sony and MS. If Nintendo moves to lootboxes and MTX, I will bash them and STOP buying their products. *I also do NOT support their online program with my money nor do I buy Amibos. So I am consistent, thus have zero idea what your point is. And circling back to the larger point. Nintendo doesn't do lootboxes. And Nintendo isn't alone. There are PLENTY of options for non lootbox games. Thousands in fact. Gamers do NOT have to support lootboxes, they are electing to support lootboxes. |
My point was that Nintendo isn't a haven. They are most likely late to the party as they were for updates, DLC, MP then paid MP, etc. And they do have games on smartphone that have lootboxes and MTX in case you don't know.
But sure I agree gamers elect to support the bad practices be it by not caring, fomo or whatever. Myself I don't buy dlc and other things, my plus is for the free games and discounts since I also don't play online.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."