By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
the-pi-guy said:
zero129 said:

That 100% locked?.

Also them IP's where made by the studios that are now owned by MS. Spider Man was never made by Sony or any of the studios it now owns. And was never ever Exclusive before. Can the same be said about any of them IP's you mentioned?.

It's a weird argument to bring this up. Why does it matter if MS owns the IPs? Sony has the rights to the Spiderman games. And those games in particular are considered their property. It's legally no different from those games for MS. 

If you want to talk about fair, it's equally unfair because those games used to be enjoyed by PlayStation gamers. 

"No the character also was not made by Sony so i dont know what you mean?."

CGi didn't say that the character was. Explicitly said the opposite. He's pointing out that Sony owns Spider-Man PS4/PS5, and Spiderman Miles Morales. The only difference between these, and Elder Scrolls/Doom, is that Sony didn't invent the characters/property. 

But I do love to see how some try to make Sony having the rights to develop a single IP (and for all we know it isn't even exclusive right) of Marvel is worse than MS buying multiple publishers that used to make multiplatform games and now will remove most of their games from Playstation.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."