the-pi-guy said:
It's a weird argument to bring this up. Why does it matter if MS owns the IPs? Sony has the rights to the Spiderman games. And those games in particular are considered their property. It's legally no different from those games for MS. If you want to talk about fair, it's equally unfair because those games used to be enjoyed by PlayStation gamers. "No the character also was not made by Sony so i dont know what you mean?." CGi didn't say that the character was. Explicitly said the opposite. He's pointing out that Sony owns Spider-Man PS4/PS5, and Spiderman Miles Morales. The only difference between these, and Elder Scrolls/Doom, is that Sony didn't invent the characters/property. |
But I do love to see how some try to make Sony having the rights to develop a single IP (and for all we know it isn't even exclusive right) of Marvel is worse than MS buying multiple publishers that used to make multiplatform games and now will remove most of their games from Playstation.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."