cyberninja45 said:
Machiavellian said:
The problem with believing that more guns stop crime or anything for that matter is that we already know from experience that it does not. One thing I noticed after a mass shooting, the GOP go on about putting armed retired citizens, school teachers and so fort but if we take a look at the latest mass shootings, all have worn body armor. More guns will not stop mass shootings or mass shooters because when they are ready to do the deed, they are going to be packing all the ammo, body armor with the best tool to take as many lives as possible. I do agree that gun laws are not enough, there would need to be a clear shift in America and how we as a country view guns before any real effective change happen. Right now, there are only just thoughts and prayers on the GOP side and their belief that more guns and more armed people will solve the issue but as we continue to see, that is not the case. Mass murders just come better prepared for the deed.
I believe I stated this before but the movie Escape from New York is looking closure like a prophecy every year in the US.
|
What do you mean guns doesn't stop crime or anything lol. Why the heck do we arm law enforcement then?
And you and others keep making this weird argument that they shouldn't bother to prepare staff because mass murderers comes prepared.
More prepared staff makes it more difficult to prepare for mass shooting no?
|
Maybe if our civilians weren't so armed we wouldn't need to arm our law enforcement as much?
I'm not against arming teachers on paper... but teachers are already underpaid and now we want them to play SWAT team? Plus I would assume the school would have to take on a heck of a lot of liability insurance in order to arm teachers.
