the-pi-guy said:
The original justices that were in favor of Roe vs Wade were all appointed by Republicans except for 1.
No, not even close. They charitably have control of 2 branches, and more realistically have control of 1.5. The Supreme Court is 6/3 with a major conservative advantage. The White House is Democrats obviously.
Some of these corporations have cafeterias on site, and some of them even hire registered dietitians to help out with some of this. A lot of companies also have health incentives. Extra pay, or they can cut your health costs if you show that you're exercising or making healthier eating choices. Even smaller companies do a lot of these things, it's even more common at big tech companies like Sony and MS.
They hid it because it's extremely controversial in the US, and other places as well. Disney is getting screwed over by Florida Republicans, because they decided to back off from supporting some bill that they were previously found to be supporting. Which is very ironic from the party complaining about cancel culture and big government. |
What about the present justices?
So it's only an advantage if they vote or rule the way you'd want them to? Their affiliation means nothing?
Is this the way things should be at corporations? You just said Democrats don't have an advantage because some Democrats are voting with Republicans. Just because something seems good or right, doesn't necessarily mean it is.
Maybe Sony should've said nothing to begin with. Maybe they shouldn't have a stance. As for Republicans and big gov, if you're not for war, but your opponent decides to build a war machine with plans to attack, you have no choice but to follow suit. Republicans aren't for big gov or cancel culture, but are making use of it to put an end to it. Much irony in American politics. Many such cases.