Ka-pi96 said:
It's not quite the same. Past examples are typically only regional powers rather than world powers. Even Rome at their height had basically no influence in Asia beyond the middle east and people in sub-Saharan Africa and the Americas probably didn't even know they existed. Also, population is a massive factor, you can't really ignore it. If you use GDP per capita then yeah, China is way below the US, but Norway is above the US. Population definitely helps the US out too. |
Power as in the collective strength of influence, technology, religious uniformity, total population, riches, and more. Collectively, putting all those things together, nothing in China or South America ever had as much power as Rome, and Rome was weaker, collectively, than the Hellenistic world it replaced, which was weaker than the Persian/Medes, which was weaker than the Babylonians. In proportion to their time, and looking at power collectively, no empire on Earth has been as powerful as the ancient Babylonians.
I say this as someone who has done quite a bit of reading books on the Statue of Nebuchadnezzar empires, love that particular sub topic of human history!